IMPACT OF REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN WEST AFRICA

Authors

  • Enegesi, Linus Bamekpari The Institute of International Trade and Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria
  • Mojekwu Ogechukwu Rita Department of Finance and Banking, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Keywords:

Trade, Economic, Trade Agreements, and Economic Growth.

Abstract

With a focus on two important indicators the export concentration index and import concentration trends this research examines the relationship between trade integration and economic growth within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The study looks at how different trade integration strategies affect economic production in ECOWAS states using a static model. The results show that although improvements in import concentration have no impact on economic development, increases in export concentration do. These findings differ from earlier research conducted in other parts of Africa, where it was shown that import and export concentration had a substantial effect on economic development. The report emphasizes how crucial export diversification is to promoting ECOWAS's sustained economic growth. Strong economic development is linked to a greater export concentration index, underscoring the advantages of a diverse, export-focused economy. Based on these observations, the researcher recommends that ECOWAS countries concentrate on investing in manufacturing and services in order to broaden their export base beyond conventional commodities. The research also recommends bolstering the industrial sector and assisting regional business owners in order to lessen dependency on imports.

References

1.Anyanwu, J. C. (2015). Rethinking the role of regional integration in Africa’s development. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

2.Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., & Feng, M. (2017). Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 105, 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.02.004

3.Chete, L. N., Adeoti, J. O., & Adeyinka, F. M. (2015). Industrialization and economic development in Nigeria: Assessing the impact of government policies. African Development Review, 27(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12141

4.Denwi, J., Ikue, N. J., Onodjaefe, J., & Simeon, M. (2022). Trade Liberalization Policy and Economic Growth in Africa: A Threshold Analysis. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(7), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.2088

5.Mevel, S., Laourari, I., Ould Hamadi, A., & Pénard, T. (2016). Trade Integration and Economic Growth in North Africa: A Comparative Analysis with ECOWAS. Revue d’économie du développement, 24(4), 63–96. https://doi.org/10.3917/edd.324.0063.

6.Onuosa, C., Eta, U., Ikue, N. J., Ikemenjima, I., & Njoku, B. (2024). Trade Liberalization and the Performance of the Manufacturing Subsector in Nigeria: A Nonlinear Approach. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486), 13(3), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v13i3.3645

7.Aboubacar, B., Deyi, X. & Ousseini, A. (2014). Does trade integration matter for economic development of Niger? Theoretical Economics Letters, 4 (9), 916 – 927.

8.Andrews, A. (2015). Exports, imports and economic performance in Liberia: Evidence from causality and co-integration analysis. Journal of Management policy and Practice, 16 (3) 95-109.

9.Balassa, B. (2018). Development strategies in semi-industrial countries. Oxford University Press.

10.Baliamoune-Lutz, M. & Ndikumana, L. (2017). The performance effects of performance to trade and the role of institutions. New evidence from African countries; University of Massachusetts, ,3(5)43-43.

11.Barro, R. (2019). Economic performance in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.

12.Billmeiner, A. & Nannicini, T. (2017). Trade integration and performance: pursuing empirical glasnost. IMF Working Paper Press.

13.Breusch, T. & Pagan, A. (2019). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficients. Econometrical, 4(7), 1287-1294.

14.Briguglio, L. & Vella, M. (2016). The relationship between economics performance and GDP performance volatility: Implications for the ASEAN. Journal of Presentation at the Asian Development Bank, 3(5),21-23.

15.Clark, J. & Mirza, S. (2016). A comparison of some common methods of detecting Granger non causality. Journal of statistical computation and simulation, 76(3), 207- 231.

16.Dickey, D. & Fuller, W. (2019). Distributions of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 7(4), 27-31.

17.Echekoba, F., Okonkwo, V. & Adigwe, P. (2015). Trade liberalization and economic performance: The Nigerian experience. Journal of poverty, Investment and Development, 1(4), 51-72.

18.Egbulonu, K. & Ezeocha, J. (2018). Trade integration and Nigeria’s economic performance. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 6(3), 1-11.

19.Frankel, J & Romer, D. (2019). Does trade cause performance? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379-99.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles